Town Planning & Urban Management drew 835 candidates in CSS 2025 and allocated 10 of them, an overall conversion of 1.2%. The paper is a solid one to score in, with a mean of 49% well above the passing line, so the filtering that thins the field is a matter of overall merit rather than the difficulty of the exam. Candidates clear this subject and then compete on their full scorecard for a modest number of seats.
The distribution here is unusual, with Balochistan taking 4 of the 10 seats, ahead of KPK and Punjab on 2 each and Azad Kashmir and Sindh Rural sharing the rest. The strong Balochistan showing breaks the usual Punjab dominance and makes this one of the more geographically distinctive subjects in the examination.
The 10 seats split evenly, with 5 going to women and 5 to men, a 50% female share that matches the CSS-wide rate almost exactly. With ten seats the parity is illustrative rather than conclusive, but it points to even conversion between men and women in this subject.
Town Planning & Urban Management's mean of 49% sits 5.5 points above the CSS optional-subject average of 43.5%, marking it as an above-average paper to score in. The favourable mean, combined with a good conversion of written passers and an unusually broad geographic spread, makes it a reasonably accessible specialist choice. With 10 seats, a strong score rather than a bare pass is what secures allocation.
Of the 835 who appeared, 17 passed the written stage and 10 of those were allocated. With a mean of 49% sitting well above the 33% threshold, the subject is not the bottleneck; candidates clear it readily and then lose around 40% of their number at the merit cut. The good conversion of written passers into seats makes this a reasonably rewarding specialist subject for those who clear the paper.
The mean of 49% clears the passing line by 16 points, and with the median higher at 53% the distribution leans to the left, carried by a body of strong scripts. A standard deviation of 17 points places a candidate one deviation below the mean at 32%, just under the threshold, which marks this as a moderate-risk paper. The average candidate passes comfortably, but a weaker showing can slip below the line, so consistent preparation matters. The high mean indicates a scoreable paper for the well-prepared. The four-point gap between median and mean reflects a left skew, where a minority of low scripts drags the average beneath the centre of the distribution, so the typical candidate scores closer to 53% than the 49% mean.
Town Planning & Urban Management is a sound choice for candidates with a genuine grasp of urban planning and management who can write analytically under exam conditions. Its above-average paper, good conversion and notably broad geographic spread, including a strong Balochistan showing, make it one of the more distinctive specialist options. As ever, the limited seats reward strong scores over mere passes.
Town Planning & Urban Management candidates averaged 49.0% of the available marks, in line with fellow Group-3 subjects Public Administration (53.0%) and Business Administration (42.0%).
Want to see how Town Planning & Urban Management stacks up against the rest? Browse every CSS 2025 subject result →
In CSS 2025, 835 candidates appeared for Town Planning & Urban Management and 17 cleared the written exam — a written pass rate of 2.04%. Of those who passed, 10 went on to be allocated a group, an overall selection rate of 1.20% of everyone who appeared.
Town Planning & Urban Management candidates scored a median of 53.0% of the paper's marks in CSS 2025 (median 53 out of 100; mean 49.0%), rating it "Average Scoring".
17 candidates cleared the written stage for Town Planning & Urban Management in 2025, and 59% of them were allocated a group — a "Moderate Competition" level for the available seats. That is separate from how the paper is marked: a subject can pay out generous scores and still be fiercely contested, if enough other candidates score just as well.
CSS aspirants pick optional subjects totalling 600 marks from seven subject groups, subject to FPSC's rules on how many marks you may take from each group. Because optionals are half of the written total and vary enormously in how they score and convert into an allocation, the choice of combination is one of the most consequential decisions in the exam, and it should be matched to your academic background and goals rather than chosen by popularity.
Start with CSSNorthStar. Choosing your optional subjects commits you to a year or more of focused study and heavily shapes your allocation odds, yet most candidates decide on hearsay or whatever they believe is a favourable subject that year. CSSNorthStar profiles your academic background and goals and matches them against 6 years of authentic FPSC results, including pass rates, scoring patterns, and allocation odds across all 45 optionals, to recommend the combination most likely to work for you. Settle your subjects first, then prepare with conviction. Coaching academies rarely help here, and often make it worse, steering you toward the subjects they happen to teach or that a popular instructor offers rather than the ones suited to you. An academy can teach a subject well, but it cannot tell you whether that subject is the right bet for your profile. Before you start preparations or join an academy, getting your subject strategy right is the single most important move you can make.
Start with the free CSSNorthStar assessment →
Founder, CSSNorthstar
Sheharyar Ahmad graduated from LUMS with BSc. (Hons.) in 2010 and topped the CSS Exam 2012 on his first attempt. He is an officer of the Pakistan Administrative Service, having served in Gilgit-Baltistan, Punjab, and Federal governments. He was awarded the Fulbright Scholarship to pursue a Master in Public Policy and Data Analytics from USA in 2022.