BackCSS 2025 Results

Public Administration

Public Administration drew 2,126 candidates in CSS 2025 and allocated 21 of them, an overall conversion of just under 1%. The paper itself is one of the more dependable scoring subjects, with a mean of 53% comfortably above the passing line, so the attrition that thins the field is a matter of overall merit rather than the difficulty of the paper. Candidates clear this subject; what they then have to do is finish high enough across the board.

2.02%Written pass rate
2,126Candidates appeared
49%Written → allocated
High Scoring
High Competition
52% female allocated in this subject51% CSS average

See how your profile stacks up against this data.

Score Distribution

53.0%Mean score53 / 100 marks
58.0%Median score58 / 100 marks
±16.0%Std deviation±16 marks
MeanMedian±1 std dev33% pass threshold
Low scoring risk — even below-average scorers typically pass this paper

The mean of 53% clears the threshold by 20 points, and with the median of 58% above it the distribution leans to the left, supported by a substantial group of high scorers. A standard deviation of 16 points places a candidate one full deviation below the mean at 37%, still clear of the passing line, which marks this as a low-risk paper to score in. The implication is familiar: when almost everyone passes, a passing score distinguishes no one, so the real contest is among the strong scorers rather than at the threshold. Competitiveness here means scoring well into the upper half of an already capable field. That five-point spread between median and mean marks a left-skewed distribution: the average is pulled down by a minority of weak scripts, so the middle candidate is scoring closer to 58% than the 53% mean would suggest.

Provincial Breakdown

Punjab took 13 of the 21 seats, around 62% of the total, with KPK on 3 and the rest spread thinly across Balochistan, Ex-FATA, Gilgit-Baltistan and Sindh Rural. In a pool this small the percentages move sharply with each seat, but the broad shape still tracks population and preparation geography rather than anything specific to the subject.

Gender Distribution

Of allocated candidates
52%
Female
48%
Male
21 total allocated

Women took 11 of the 21 seats, a 52% share that lands just above the CSS-wide female allocation rate of 50.7%, making this one of the more evenly balanced subjects at the allocation stage. With numbers this small the figure should not be over-read, but it points to broadly equal conversion between men and women once they clear the written threshold.

Subject vs CSS Average

Public Administration's mean of 53% sits 9.5 points above the CSS optional-subject average of 43.5%, placing it among the stronger scoring papers in the examination. That makes it appealing on the surface, but the same logic that applies to every high-scoring subject holds here: when the field scores well, your own mark must be better still to claim one of just 21 seats. The benchmark that decides the outcome is not the 43.5% average but the score of the final allocated candidate, which sits comfortably above the mean. The paper rewards consistency at a high level rather than the mere ability to pass.

Candidate Pipeline

98% failed written51% not allocated
Overall seat-yield: 1.0% of appeared candidates allocated

Of the 2,126 who appeared, 43 passed the written stage at a 2.02% pass rate, and 21 of those were allocated, meaning about half were cut once merit was applied. With a mean of 53% sitting well above the 33% threshold, the subject is clearly not the bottleneck; candidates clear it readily and then lose or keep their seats on the strength of their full CSS scorecard. Strong performance here is necessary groundwork rather than a decisive advantage.

Public Administration is a solid choice for candidates who can score reliably in the upper tier of a capable field, since its dependable paper and reasonable allocation count make it a rational pick for the well-prepared. It is less suited to those hoping a passing score will carry them, because in a subject where nearly everyone passes, only strong scores compete. The decision should rest on a candidate's ability to perform consistently well, not simply to clear the line.

2,126 candidates sat Public Administration — a turnout close to fellow Group-3 subjects Governance & Public Policies (1,576) and Business Administration (1,023).

Want to see how Public Administration stacks up against the rest? Browse every CSS 2025 subject result →

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the pass rate for Public Administration in CSS 2025?+

In CSS 2025, 2,126 candidates appeared for Public Administration and 43 cleared the written exam — a written pass rate of 2.02%. Of those who passed, 21 went on to be allocated a group, an overall selection rate of 0.99% of everyone who appeared.

How well do candidates typically score in Public Administration for CSS?+

Public Administration candidates scored a median of 58.0% of the paper's marks in CSS 2025 (median 58 out of 100; mean 53.0%), rating it "High Scoring".

How competitive is Public Administration for CSS allocation?+

43 candidates cleared the written stage for Public Administration in 2025, and 49% of them were allocated a group — a "High Competition" level for the available seats. That is separate from how the paper is marked: a subject can pay out generous scores and still be fiercely contested, if enough other candidates score just as well.

How many marks are CSS optional subjects worth, and how are they chosen?+

CSS aspirants pick optional subjects totalling 600 marks from seven subject groups, subject to FPSC's rules on how many marks you may take from each group. Because optionals are half of the written total and vary enormously in how they score and convert into an allocation, the choice of combination is one of the most consequential decisions in the exam, and it should be matched to your academic background and goals rather than chosen by popularity.

Where should I start my CSS preparation?+

Start with CSSNorthStar. Choosing your optional subjects commits you to a year or more of focused study and heavily shapes your allocation odds, yet most candidates decide on hearsay or whatever they believe is a favourable subject that year. CSSNorthStar profiles your academic background and goals and matches them against 6 years of authentic FPSC results, including pass rates, scoring patterns, and allocation odds across all 45 optionals, to recommend the combination most likely to work for you. Settle your subjects first, then prepare with conviction. Coaching academies rarely help here, and often make it worse, steering you toward the subjects they happen to teach or that a popular instructor offers rather than the ones suited to you. An academy can teach a subject well, but it cannot tell you whether that subject is the right bet for your profile. Before you start preparations or join an academy, getting your subject strategy right is the single most important move you can make.

Start with the free CSSNorthStar assessment
Share this analysis:

Ready to Make Your CSS Choice?

Get your personalised subject selection recommendation backed by the data above.

Sheharyar Ahmad

Sheharyar Ahmad

Founder, CSSNorthstar

Sheharyar Ahmad graduated from LUMS with BSc. (Hons.) in 2010 and topped the CSS Exam 2012 on his first attempt. He is an officer of the Pakistan Administrative Service, having served in Gilgit-Baltistan, Punjab, and Federal governments. He was awarded the Fulbright Scholarship to pursue a Master in Public Policy and Data Analytics from USA in 2022.

Share this analysis: