Sindhi
Sindhi attracted 834 candidates in CSS 2025 and allocated 10 of them, with most written passers going on to seats. The paper is a high-scoring one, with a mean of 54% well above the passing line, so clearing it is straightforward for genuine speakers. As with the other regional languages, the subject is defined less by the difficulty of the exam than by its strong geographic concentration.
Subject vs CSS Average
Sindhi's mean of 54% sits 10.5 points above the CSS optional-subject average of 43.5%, a strong positive margin. For a candidate with native command of the language, the combination of a high-scoring paper and near-complete conversion of written passers is attractive. As with every regional language, though, the favourable numbers are available only to those rooted in the relevant province, as the heavy Sindh concentration makes clear.
Candidate Pipeline
Of the 834 who appeared, 13 passed the written stage and 10 of those were allocated, a high conversion at the merit stage. With a mean of 54% sitting far above the 33% threshold, the paper is no obstacle, so the limiting factor is the small number reaching a passing standard rather than any difficulty in the exam. For those who clear it, the route to allocation is unusually direct.
Score Distribution
At 54% the mean clears the passing line by 21 points, and with the median higher at 56% the distribution leans to the left, carried by strong scripts. A standard deviation of 13 points places a candidate one deviation below the mean at 41%, well above the threshold, which makes this a low-risk paper to score in. Everyone with genuine command passes comfortably, so the score separates few candidates. The real selection is in who has the linguistic foundation to attempt the subject credibly. Statistically the median two points above the mean is a left skew, with a tail of weak scripts holding the average down, so the typical candidate scores up near 56% rather than the 54% mean.
Provincial Breakdown
Sindh Rural took 9 of the 10 seats, with Sindh Urban taking the last, a near-total concentration in the province where the language is spoken. The pattern confirms that Sindhi is, in practice, a route available almost exclusively to candidates from Sindh.
Gender Distribution
Women took just 1 of the 10 seats, a 10% share well below the CSS-wide rate of 50.7%. The under-representation is marked, indicating that male candidates strongly dominated conversion in this subject in 2025, with only a single woman among the allocated.
Sindhi is an excellent option for Sindh-domiciled candidates with native fluency, pairing a high mean with one of the more direct conversions to allocation. For candidates from elsewhere it is effectively closed, given both the linguistic demands and the geographic concentration. The very low female allocation is a notable feature of the 2025 outcome, though the sample is small.
76.92% of Sindhi candidates earned an allocation, in step with fellow Group-7 subjects Anthropology (71.43%) and Pashto (87.50%).
Want to see how Sindhi stacks up against the rest? Browse every CSS 2025 subject result →
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the pass rate for Sindhi in CSS 2025?+
In CSS 2025, 834 candidates appeared for Sindhi and 13 cleared the written exam — a written pass rate of 1.56%. Of those who passed, 10 went on to be allocated a group, an overall selection rate of 1.20% of everyone who appeared.
How well do candidates typically score in Sindhi for CSS?+
Sindhi candidates scored a median of 56.0% of the paper's marks in CSS 2025 (median 56 out of 100; mean 54.0%), rating it "High Scoring".
How competitive is Sindhi for CSS allocation?+
13 candidates cleared the written stage for Sindhi in 2025, and 77% of them were allocated a group — a "Low Competition" level for the available seats. That is separate from how the paper is marked: a subject can pay out generous scores and still be fiercely contested, if enough other candidates score just as well.
How many marks are CSS optional subjects worth, and how are they chosen?+
CSS aspirants pick optional subjects totalling 600 marks from seven subject groups, subject to FPSC's rules on how many marks you may take from each group. Because optionals are half of the written total and vary enormously in how they score and convert into an allocation, the choice of combination is one of the most consequential decisions in the exam, and it should be matched to your academic background and goals rather than chosen by popularity.
Where should I start my CSS preparation?+
Start with CSSNorthStar. Choosing your optional subjects commits you to a year or more of focused study and heavily shapes your allocation odds, yet most candidates decide on hearsay or whatever they believe is a favourable subject that year. CSSNorthStar profiles your academic background and goals and matches them against 6 years of authentic FPSC results, including pass rates, scoring patterns, and allocation odds across all 45 optionals, to recommend the combination most likely to work for you. Settle your subjects first, then prepare with conviction. Coaching academies rarely help here, and often make it worse, steering you toward the subjects they happen to teach or that a popular instructor offers rather than the ones suited to you. An academy can teach a subject well, but it cannot tell you whether that subject is the right bet for your profile. Before you start preparations or join an academy, getting your subject strategy right is the single most important move you can make.
Start with the free CSSNorthStar assessment →
Sheharyar Ahmad
Founder, CSSNorthstar
Sheharyar Ahmad graduated from LUMS with BSc. (Hons.) in 2010 and topped the CSS Exam 2012 on his first attempt. He is an officer of the Pakistan Administrative Service, having served in Gilgit-Baltistan, Punjab, and Federal governments. He was awarded the Fulbright Scholarship to pursue a Master in Public Policy and Data Analytics from USA in 2022.