BackCSS 2025 Results

Pashto

1.31%Written pass rate
1,221Candidates appeared
88%Written → allocated

Pashto attracted 1,221 candidates in CSS 2025 and allocated 14 of them, with nearly all the written passers going on to seats. The paper is a high-scoring one, with a mean of 59% well above the passing line, so clearing it is straightforward for genuine speakers. As with the other regional languages, the subject is shaped less by the difficulty of the exam than by its strong geographic concentration.

High Scoring
Low Competition
29% female allocated in this subject51% CSS average↓ Under-represented

See how your profile stacks up against this data.

Candidate Pipeline

99% failed written13% not allocated
Overall seat-yield: 1.1% of appeared candidates allocated

Of the 1,221 who appeared, 16 passed the written stage and 14 of those were allocated, an unusually high conversion at the merit stage. With a mean of 59% sitting far above the 33% threshold, the paper is no obstacle, so the limiting factor is the small number reaching a passing standard rather than any difficulty in the exam. For those who clear it, the route to allocation is among the most direct of any subject.

Score Distribution

59.0%Mean score59 / 100 marks
62.0%Median score62 / 100 marks
±16.0%Std deviation±16 marks
MeanMedian±1 std dev33% pass threshold
Low scoring risk — even below-average scorers typically pass this paper

At 59% the mean clears the passing line by 26 points, and with the median higher at 62% the distribution leans firmly to the left, carried by strong scripts. A standard deviation of 16 points places a candidate one deviation below the mean at 43%, well above the threshold, which makes this a low-risk paper to score in. Everyone with genuine command passes comfortably, so the score separates few candidates. The real selection is in who has the linguistic foundation to attempt the subject credibly. Statistically the three-point gap between median and mean is a left skew, with a few weak scripts dragging the average down, so the typical candidate scores closer to 62% than the 59% mean implies.

Provincial Breakdown

KPK took 10 of the 14 seats, with Balochistan and Ex-FATA sharing the rest, which is exactly what the language's geographic base would predict. The concentration confirms that Pashto is, in practice, a route available almost entirely to candidates from the Pashto-speaking regions.

Gender Distribution

Of allocated candidates
29%
Female
71%
Male
14 total allocated

Women took 4 of the 14 seats, a 29% share that sits below the CSS-wide rate of 50.7%. The under-representation is notable, indicating that male candidates converted at a higher rate in this subject, consistent with the demographics of the regions where the language is strongest.

Subject vs CSS Average

Pashto's mean of 59% sits a substantial 15.5 points above the CSS optional-subject average of 43.5%, among the stronger positive margins in the examination. For a candidate with native command of the language, the combination of a high-scoring paper and near-complete conversion of written passers is genuinely attractive. The favourable numbers, however, are available only to those rooted in the Pashto-speaking regions, as the geographic concentration makes plain.

Pashto is an excellent option for candidates from the Pashto-speaking regions with native fluency, pairing a high mean with one of the most direct conversions to allocation in the examination. For candidates from elsewhere it is effectively closed, given both the linguistic demands and the heavy geographic concentration. Chosen from genuine command, it is among the safer scoring choices available.

87.50% of Pashto candidates earned an allocation, in step with fellow Group-7 subjects Sindhi (76.92%) and Balochi (100.00%).

Want to see how Pashto stacks up against the rest? Browse every CSS 2025 subject result →

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the pass rate for Pashto in CSS 2025?+

In CSS 2025, 1,221 candidates appeared for Pashto and 16 cleared the written exam — a written pass rate of 1.31%. Of those who passed, 14 went on to be allocated a group, an overall selection rate of 1.15% of everyone who appeared.

How well do candidates typically score in Pashto for CSS?+

Pashto candidates scored a median of 62.0% of the paper's marks in CSS 2025 (median 62 out of 100; mean 59.0%), rating it "High Scoring".

How competitive is Pashto for CSS allocation?+

16 candidates cleared the written stage for Pashto in 2025, and 88% of them were allocated a group — a "Low Competition" level for the available seats. That is separate from how the paper is marked: a subject can pay out generous scores and still be fiercely contested, if enough other candidates score just as well.

How many marks are CSS optional subjects worth, and how are they chosen?+

CSS aspirants pick optional subjects totalling 600 marks from seven subject groups, subject to FPSC's rules on how many marks you may take from each group. Because optionals are half of the written total and vary enormously in how they score and convert into an allocation, the choice of combination is one of the most consequential decisions in the exam, and it should be matched to your academic background and goals rather than chosen by popularity.

Where should I start my CSS preparation?+

Start with CSSNorthStar. Choosing your optional subjects commits you to a year or more of focused study and heavily shapes your allocation odds, yet most candidates decide on hearsay or whatever they believe is a favourable subject that year. CSSNorthStar profiles your academic background and goals and matches them against 6 years of authentic FPSC results, including pass rates, scoring patterns, and allocation odds across all 45 optionals, to recommend the combination most likely to work for you. Settle your subjects first, then prepare with conviction. Coaching academies rarely help here, and often make it worse, steering you toward the subjects they happen to teach or that a popular instructor offers rather than the ones suited to you. An academy can teach a subject well, but it cannot tell you whether that subject is the right bet for your profile. Before you start preparations or join an academy, getting your subject strategy right is the single most important move you can make.

Start with the free CSSNorthStar assessment
Share this analysis:

Ready to Make Your CSS Choice?

Get your personalised subject selection recommendation backed by the data above.

Sheharyar Ahmad

Sheharyar Ahmad

Founder, CSSNorthstar

Sheharyar Ahmad graduated from LUMS with BSc. (Hons.) in 2010 and topped the CSS Exam 2012 on his first attempt. He is an officer of the Pakistan Administrative Service, having served in Gilgit-Baltistan, Punjab, and Federal governments. He was awarded the Fulbright Scholarship to pursue a Master in Public Policy and Data Analytics from USA in 2022.

Share this analysis: