Statistics
Statistics drew 116 candidates in CSS 2025 and allocated a single one of them. The paper is reasonably scoreable, with a mean of 46% above the field average, so the lone allocation reflects a very thin written pass and a hard merit cut rather than a difficult exam. Only two candidates cleared the written stage from the full field.
Score Distribution
The mean of 46% clears the passing line by 13 points, and with the median almost identical at 47.5% the distribution is fairly symmetric and sits well above the threshold. A standard deviation of 24 points is very wide, however, placing a candidate one deviation below the mean at 22%, well short of passing. That makes this a moderate-risk paper despite the strong average, because the large spread drops a substantial share below the line. The high mean coexists with real volatility, so consistent accuracy is what keeps a candidate safely above the threshold.
Provincial Breakdown
The lone allocation went to a Punjab candidate, with no other province securing a seat. One allocation provides no distribution to interpret beyond recording the single successful candidate's province.
Gender Distribution
The one allocated candidate was a man, making the female share zero in a sample of a single seat. No conclusion about gendered conversion can be drawn from one outcome.
Subject vs CSS Average
Statistics' mean of 46% sits 2.5 points above the CSS optional-subject average of 43.5%, marking it as a slightly above-average paper to score in. The favourable mean is largely beside the point given the outcome, since the subject produced only one allocation from 116 candidates. A strong average drawn from a field where almost no one cleared the written stage tells a candidate little about their genuine prospects.
Candidate Pipeline
Of the 116 who appeared, 2 passed the written stage and 1 was allocated. With a mean of 46% sitting above the 33% threshold, the paper is not the obstacle, yet only two candidates reached a passing standard and just one survived the merit cut. A single allocation from 116 leaves no margin at all.
Statistics suits candidates with a strong quantitative foundation who can deliver accurate, complete solutions under exam pressure, and even they should weigh the 2025 record. One allocation from 116 applicants is a stark figure. The scoreable paper is not the opportunity it looks like, because almost no candidate converted it into a seat.
Statistics candidates averaged 46.0% of the available marks, in line with fellow Group-2 subjects Geology (49.0%) and Chemistry (40.5%).
Want to see how Statistics stacks up against the rest? Browse every CSS 2025 subject result →
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the pass rate for Statistics in CSS 2025?+
In CSS 2025, 116 candidates appeared for Statistics and 2 cleared the written exam — a written pass rate of 1.72%. Of those who passed, 1 went on to be allocated a group, an overall selection rate of 0.86% of everyone who appeared.
How well do candidates typically score in Statistics for CSS?+
Statistics candidates scored a median of 47.5% of the paper's marks in CSS 2025 (median 47.5 out of 100; mean 46.0%), rating it "Average Scoring".
How competitive is Statistics for CSS allocation?+
2 candidates cleared the written stage for Statistics in 2025, and 50% of them were allocated a group — a "Low Competition" level for the available seats. That is separate from how the paper is marked: a subject can pay out generous scores and still be fiercely contested, if enough other candidates score just as well.
How many marks are CSS optional subjects worth, and how are they chosen?+
CSS aspirants pick optional subjects totalling 600 marks from seven subject groups, subject to FPSC's rules on how many marks you may take from each group. Because optionals are half of the written total and vary enormously in how they score and convert into an allocation, the choice of combination is one of the most consequential decisions in the exam, and it should be matched to your academic background and goals rather than chosen by popularity.
Where should I start my CSS preparation?+
Start with CSSNorthStar. Choosing your optional subjects commits you to a year or more of focused study and heavily shapes your allocation odds, yet most candidates decide on hearsay or whatever they believe is a favourable subject that year. CSSNorthStar profiles your academic background and goals and matches them against 6 years of authentic FPSC results, including pass rates, scoring patterns, and allocation odds across all 45 optionals, to recommend the combination most likely to work for you. Settle your subjects first, then prepare with conviction. Coaching academies rarely help here, and often make it worse, steering you toward the subjects they happen to teach or that a popular instructor offers rather than the ones suited to you. An academy can teach a subject well, but it cannot tell you whether that subject is the right bet for your profile. Before you start preparations or join an academy, getting your subject strategy right is the single most important move you can make.
Start with the free CSSNorthStar assessment →
Sheharyar Ahmad
Founder, CSSNorthstar
Sheharyar Ahmad graduated from LUMS with BSc. (Hons.) in 2010 and topped the CSS Exam 2012 on his first attempt. He is an officer of the Pakistan Administrative Service, having served in Gilgit-Baltistan, Punjab, and Federal governments. He was awarded the Fulbright Scholarship to pursue a Master in Public Policy and Data Analytics from USA in 2022.