Muslim Law & Jurisprudence
Muslim Law & Jurisprudence drew 295 candidates in CSS 2025 and allocated a single one of them. The paper is a strong one to score in, with a mean of 53% well above the passing line, so the lone allocation reflects a very thin written pass and a hard merit cut rather than a difficult exam. Only four candidates cleared the written stage from the full field.
Subject vs CSS Average
Muslim Law & Jurisprudence's mean of 53% sits 9.5 points above the CSS optional-subject average of 43.5%, marking it as a comfortably above-average paper to score in. The strong mean is real but largely academic given the outcome, since the subject produced only one allocation from 295 candidates. A high average drawn from a field where so few cleared the written stage tells a candidate little about their genuine odds.
Candidate Pipeline
Of the 295 who appeared, 4 passed the written stage and 1 was allocated. With a mean of 53% sitting well above the 33% threshold, the paper is not the obstacle, yet only four candidates reached a passing standard and just one survived the merit cut. A single allocation from 295 leaves almost no room for error.
Score Distribution
The mean of 53% clears the passing line by 20 points, and with the median higher still at 57% the distribution leans firmly to the left, carried by strong scripts. A standard deviation of 19 points places a candidate one deviation below the mean at 34%, just above the threshold, which makes this a low-risk paper to score in. Even below-average candidates clear the line, so the score separates few of the small number who attempt the subject seriously. The constraint is the thin field and the single seat, not the difficulty of the paper. The median sitting four points above the mean is the signature of a left skew: a few low scripts drag the average down, so the middle candidate is scoring nearer 57% than the 53% mean implies.
Provincial Breakdown
The lone allocation went to a KPK candidate, with no other province securing a seat. One allocation offers no distribution to read beyond recording the single successful candidate's province.
Gender Distribution
The one allocated candidate was a man, making the female share zero in a sample of a single seat. No conclusion about gendered conversion can be drawn from one outcome.
Muslim Law & Jurisprudence suits candidates with a genuine command of Islamic legal principles who can write to a high standard, and even they should weigh the 2025 record. One allocation from 295 applicants is a stark figure. The scoreable paper is not the opportunity it looks like, because almost no candidate converted it into a seat.
At a 1.4% written pass rate, Muslim Law & Jurisprudence tracks close to fellow Group-6 subjects International Law (1.5%) and Law (2.0%).
Want to see how Muslim Law & Jurisprudence stacks up against the rest? Browse every CSS 2025 subject result →
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the pass rate for Muslim Law & Jurisprudence in CSS 2025?+
In CSS 2025, 295 candidates appeared for Muslim Law & Jurisprudence and 4 cleared the written exam — a written pass rate of 1.36%. Of those who passed, 1 went on to be allocated a group, an overall selection rate of 0.34% of everyone who appeared.
How well do candidates typically score in Muslim Law & Jurisprudence for CSS?+
Muslim Law & Jurisprudence candidates scored a median of 57.0% of the paper's marks in CSS 2025 (median 57 out of 100; mean 53.0%), rating it "High Scoring".
How competitive is Muslim Law & Jurisprudence for CSS allocation?+
4 candidates cleared the written stage for Muslim Law & Jurisprudence in 2025, and 25% of them were allocated a group — a "Moderate Competition" level for the available seats. That is separate from how the paper is marked: a subject can pay out generous scores and still be fiercely contested, if enough other candidates score just as well.
How many marks are CSS optional subjects worth, and how are they chosen?+
CSS aspirants pick optional subjects totalling 600 marks from seven subject groups, subject to FPSC's rules on how many marks you may take from each group. Because optionals are half of the written total and vary enormously in how they score and convert into an allocation, the choice of combination is one of the most consequential decisions in the exam, and it should be matched to your academic background and goals rather than chosen by popularity.
Where should I start my CSS preparation?+
Start with CSSNorthStar. Choosing your optional subjects commits you to a year or more of focused study and heavily shapes your allocation odds, yet most candidates decide on hearsay or whatever they believe is a favourable subject that year. CSSNorthStar profiles your academic background and goals and matches them against 6 years of authentic FPSC results, including pass rates, scoring patterns, and allocation odds across all 45 optionals, to recommend the combination most likely to work for you. Settle your subjects first, then prepare with conviction. Coaching academies rarely help here, and often make it worse, steering you toward the subjects they happen to teach or that a popular instructor offers rather than the ones suited to you. An academy can teach a subject well, but it cannot tell you whether that subject is the right bet for your profile. Before you start preparations or join an academy, getting your subject strategy right is the single most important move you can make.
Start with the free CSSNorthStar assessment →
Sheharyar Ahmad
Founder, CSSNorthstar
Sheharyar Ahmad graduated from LUMS with BSc. (Hons.) in 2010 and topped the CSS Exam 2012 on his first attempt. He is an officer of the Pakistan Administrative Service, having served in Gilgit-Baltistan, Punjab, and Federal governments. He was awarded the Fulbright Scholarship to pursue a Master in Public Policy and Data Analytics from USA in 2022.