Islamic History & Culture drew 588 candidates in CSS 2025 and allocated 8 of them, an overall conversion of 1.36%. The paper is one of the higher-scoring subjects, with a mean of 66% well clear of the passing line, so this is not a difficult exam to pass. The contest is decided instead by standing out within a field where strong scores are common and the number of seats is modest.
Of the 588 who appeared, 13 passed the written stage and 8 of those were allocated. With a mean of 66% sitting far above the 33% threshold, the paper is no obstacle, so the limiting factor is the small written pass count and the merit cut that followed. That 8 of 13 written passers secured seats reflects a relatively forgiving merit stage for the strong candidates who reached it.
At 66% the mean clears the passing line by a wide 33 points, and with the median higher still at 73% the distribution leans firmly to the left, carried by a body of high scorers. A standard deviation of 25 points is large, placing a candidate one deviation below the mean at 41%, still comfortably above the threshold, which makes this a low-risk paper to score in. Everyone who engages seriously with the subject passes, so the score does little to separate candidates. The real selection is among the strong scorers competing for a small number of seats. In statistical terms this is a left-skewed distribution: because the median sits seven points above the mean, the average is being held down by a thin tail of low scorers, so the typical candidate actually performs better than the headline mean of 66% suggests.
Punjab took 5 of the 8 seats, with Sindh Rural on 2 and KPK on 1. With only eight allocations the distribution is coarse, but the concentration in Punjab is consistent with the broader pattern across the examination.
Women took 5 of the 8 seats, a 62.5% share that runs ahead of the CSS-wide rate of 50.7%. With eight seats the figure should not be over-read, but it points to female candidates converting at a somewhat higher rate once they clear the written stage in this subject.
Islamic History & Culture's mean of 66% sits a substantial 22.5 points above the CSS optional-subject average of 43.5%, one of the strongest positive margins in the examination. That makes it an appealing scoring subject, but a high field average raises the bar for everyone, so a strong individual score is needed to claim one of just 8 seats. With the paper this generous, the benchmark that matters is not the 43.5% average but the score of the last candidate allocated, which sits well above the mean.
Islamic History & Culture is a sound choice for candidates with a genuine command of the subject who can score in the upper tier of a high-scoring field. Its accessible paper makes a pass routine, but the modest seat count means only strong scores compete. Chosen from real knowledge rather than as an assumed easy option, it is a reasonable bet for the well-prepared.
588 candidates sat Islamic History & Culture — a turnout close to fellow Group-4 subjects British History (545) and European History (1,915).
Want to see how Islamic History & Culture stacks up against the rest? Browse every CSS 2025 subject result →
In CSS 2025, 588 candidates appeared for Islamic History & Culture and 13 cleared the written exam — a written pass rate of 2.21%. Of those who passed, 8 went on to be allocated a group, an overall selection rate of 1.36% of everyone who appeared.
Islamic History & Culture candidates scored a median of 73.0% of the paper's marks in CSS 2025 (median 73 out of 100; mean 66.0%), rating it "High Scoring".
13 candidates cleared the written stage for Islamic History & Culture in 2025, and 62% of them were allocated a group — a "Low Competition" level for the available seats. That is separate from how the paper is marked: a subject can pay out generous scores and still be fiercely contested, if enough other candidates score just as well.
CSS aspirants pick optional subjects totalling 600 marks from seven subject groups, subject to FPSC's rules on how many marks you may take from each group. Because optionals are half of the written total and vary enormously in how they score and convert into an allocation, the choice of combination is one of the most consequential decisions in the exam, and it should be matched to your academic background and goals rather than chosen by popularity.
Start with CSSNorthStar. Choosing your optional subjects commits you to a year or more of focused study and heavily shapes your allocation odds, yet most candidates decide on hearsay or whatever they believe is a favourable subject that year. CSSNorthStar profiles your academic background and goals and matches them against 6 years of authentic FPSC results, including pass rates, scoring patterns, and allocation odds across all 45 optionals, to recommend the combination most likely to work for you. Settle your subjects first, then prepare with conviction. Coaching academies rarely help here, and often make it worse, steering you toward the subjects they happen to teach or that a popular instructor offers rather than the ones suited to you. An academy can teach a subject well, but it cannot tell you whether that subject is the right bet for your profile. Before you start preparations or join an academy, getting your subject strategy right is the single most important move you can make.
Start with the free CSSNorthStar assessment →
Founder, CSSNorthstar
Sheharyar Ahmad graduated from LUMS with BSc. (Hons.) in 2010 and topped the CSS Exam 2012 on his first attempt. He is an officer of the Pakistan Administrative Service, having served in Gilgit-Baltistan, Punjab, and Federal governments. He was awarded the Fulbright Scholarship to pursue a Master in Public Policy and Data Analytics from USA in 2022.